Thecameras are: Fujifilm X-T2, Fujifilm GFX, Panasonic GH5S, Sony A7R II, Sony A6500, Canon EOS 5DSR, Canon EOS 5D Mark III and the Canon EOS 80D. Remember, this isn't meant to be a scientific test of the X-H1 - we don't have obvious rivals like the the Olympus O-MD E-M1 II to hand - but it does give you an idea of how it compares to cameras 3 1.04m-Dot 3-Way Tilt LCD Touchscreen. 325-Point Intelligent Hybrid AF System. 1080p at 120 fps; Flicker Reduction Mode. 1.28″ Sub-LCD Top Screen. Weather-Sealed Body; 2 UHS-II SD Slots. Offering plenty of features inside a durable magnesium-alloy housing, the FUJIFILM X-H1 Mirrorless Digital Camera from Fujifilm aims to position itself mainfeatures: x-h1 24.3mp aps-c x-trans cmos iii sensor x-processor pro engine 5-axis in-body image stabilization internal dci 4k video and f-log gamma sony a6500 24.2mp aps-c exmor cmos sensor Quaviệc so sánh Fujifilm X-H1 và Sony A6500, ta có thể thấy rằng Fujifilm đã tạo ra một chiếc máy mạnh mẽ về tính năng và cả thiết kế để đối đầu cùng Sony trong hệ thống Mirrorless sử dụng cảm biến APS-C. Nếu bạn là người thích trải nghiệm công nghệ mới và cần sự chuyên nghiệp đặc biệt thì X-H1 nên FujifilmX-H1 Vs. Sony A7III Vs. Sony A6500 Comparisons Inmy case, the Fujifilm system is an adjunct to my high MP full-frame system. The latter is still my go-to for most tripod-based work (a lot of landscape photography) and a few other things. For most handheld photography, the resolution of the APS-C system is plenty good and I can make/sell 20" x 30" prints from it. t2Mm. February 17, 2018Cameras4K, camera, comparison, fujifilm, Fujifilm X-H1, hybrid, Mirrorless, sensor, Sony, video Two years ago, Fujifilm announced its most popular X-Series camera to date, the X-T2. It was one of many “second generation” mirrorless cameras to hit the market that year and included characteristics one would expect from a high-end product such as a more robust housing, an improved autofocus system and 4K video. The recently announced Fujifilm X-H1 is built upon the strengths of the X-T2, making it the most powerful X-Series camera in the range. In this comparison preview, we’re going to take a look at how the new X-H1 compares to one of its main rivals on the mirrorless market, the Sony a6500. Despite sharing similar characteristics, including a 24MP APS-C sensor, advanced hybrid autofocus system, 5-axis sensor stabilisation and advanced video capabilities, there are quite a few ways in which they differ as we’ll discover below. … Read full post here Let’s compare the Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500. Our comparison table below covers all the important specifications of each camera. Fujifilm has unveiled the X-H1 mirrorless camera with megapixel APS-C sized X-Trans CMOS III sensor and X-Processor Pro image processing engine. Even the new X-H1 has the same sensor in resolution to the Sony A6500, it has a significantly larger and heavier body. In our opinion, the X-H1 is quite expensive. Do you think that the X-H1, with the price tag of only $1,900, offers enough features against the A6500? The Fujifilm X-H1 is the company’s highest performance APS-C model with most video-capable features. It’s based on the X-T2 but adds in-body image stabilization as well as DCI 4K and more comprehensive set of video options. If you’re trying to decide which one to buy as your first camera, check out the differences between the Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500 cameras. Specifications Comparison of Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500 Cameras Below you can see the specs comparison table of Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500 cameras. Some differences like sensor, image size, shooting speed, lcd size etc.. detailed as bold on the table. Fujifilm X-H1 Sony A6500 Sensor resolution 24MP 24MP Sensor size APS-C APS-C Image Stablization 5-axis, 5-axis Burst speed 14 fps with e-shutter, 8 fps mechanical 11 with grip 11 fps AF Joystick? 8-way No Touchscreen Yes Yes Screen articulation Two-axis tilt Tilt EVF dots dots Viewfinder magnification RAW buffer 40 231 JPEG buffer 27 110 Video Bit depth 8 8 Max bitrate 200 Mbps 100 Mbps Mic / Headphone sockets? Yes / On VPB-XH1 accessory grip Yes / No Log capture? Yes Yes HDMI Micro Micro USB Micro Type B Micro Type B Battery life CIPA 310 310 Dimensions x x in. 140 x 97 x 86 mm x x in. 120 x 67 x 53 mm Weight with card and battery 673g 453g Price body only $1,900 $1,298 FUJIFILM X-H1 advantages over Fujifilm X-T2 In-body image stabilization – Yes Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds Higher Max Flash Sync Reduce the effect of ambient light in flash shots Dual Card Slots – Yes Always-on wireless connectivity Top Deck Display – Yes Check settings with a screen on top of the camera Faster burst rate 14fps vs 11 fps Faster Shutter Speed 1/32000 vs 1/4000 sec Sony A6500 advantages over FUJIFILM X-H1 Less Expensive – Save money for lenses or accessories Built-in NFC Yes Internal Flash Yes Thinner and Lighter Bigger JPEG and RAW Buffer 1 Doing some high ISO test among my two current favorite IBIS bodies Disclaimer I am with no intention not since I registered with this site in 2016, not to mention being a lurker since 2014 to persuade/convert any body in this FUJI wonderful & friendly forum to buy any thing or switch brand. This is a Fuji forum, I love Fuji but that doesn't mean I only shoot Fuji. I will choose and spend money toward gears that fit/satisfy my hobby. That's including my all time favorite Canon 20D & 7D-II, Nikon D610, etc. I have never bought so many Fuji bodies/lenses in my life. So I've always considered myself a Fuji fan. Glad to get this out of the way. The following unscientific tests was for me to see what limit I can push these two bodies in extreme low light condition With that, how far I can push those high ISO for usable images in this coming trip to Asia All shots are handheld, candle light really dim, ISO shown on pix below, f/ on all shots, 1/20s - 1/125s, SOOC 1st image is from X-H1 ranging ISO 6400, 12800, 25600 with 16-55 2nd image is from a6500 with the same ISO range with Canon 85mm 3rd image is from a6500 with NR turned on with Canon 85mm Overall, I'm quite happy with both of my X-H1, and a6500 Not enough to distinguish except the group with NR pretty neat result All images are definitely usable at ISO 6400 Thanks for looking! Last edited Jun 15, 2019 2 Doing some high ISO test among my two current favorite IBIS bodies Disclaimer I am with no intention not since I registered with this site in 2016, not to mention being a lurker since 2014 to persuade/convert any body in this FUJI wonderful & friendly forum to buy any thing or switch brand. This is a Fuji forum, I love Fuji but that doesn't mean I only shoot Fuji. I will choose and spend money toward gears that fit/satisfy my hobby. That's including my all time favorite Canon 20D & 7D-II, Nikon D610, etc. I have never bought so many Fuji bodies/lenses in my life. So I've always considered myself a Fuji fan. Glad to get this out of the way. The following unscientific tests was for me to see what limit I can push these two bodies in extreme low light condition With that, how far I can push those high ISO for usable images in this coming trip to Asia All shots are handheld, candle light really dim, ISO shown on pix below, f/ on all shots, 1/20s - 1/125s, SOOC 1st image is from X-H1 ranging ISO 6400, 12800, 25600 with 16-55 2nd image is from a6500 with the same ISO range with Canon 85mm 3rd image is from a6500 with NR turned on with Canon 85mm Overall, I'm quite happy with both of my X-H1, and a6500 Not enough to distinguish except the group with NR pretty neat result All images are definitely usable at ISO 6400 Thanks for looking! Thanks for the research! 3 Pretty impressive NR on the Sony really... How much crop? Thanks for sharing LionSpeed 4 Pretty impressive NR on the Sony really... How much crop? Thanks for sharing LionSpeed Thanks so much Chuck and Shadowside Crop? I'm very poor in math, so bare with me here First I scale the original down from 6000px to 3000px in photoshop then copy and paste those images in 1600px X 1607px new document to post in here at 100% 5 To my eyes, the Sony with NR looks the best. 6 Plastic doesn't have the same texture and detail as human skin, so I would be cautious thinking this test as good as it is would translate into the same results with a human subject. That's been one of the hardest tests for NR to really impress with, not making skin waxy and flat looking. This subject is already waxy, so no real harm done. But, what this test does reveal well is how the noise has been handled in the mid-tone areas and in retaining a lot of the details in the beads and around the eyes. All in, very impressive how far along this technology has come. 7 Plastic doesn't have the same texture and detail as human skin, so I would be cautious thinking this test as good as it is would translate into the same results with a human subject. That's been one of the hardest tests for NR to really impress with, not making skin waxy and flat looking. +1 I'd add, it's not fair to use a zoom against primes. In comparison, XF 16-55/ with a total of 17 elements in 12 groups, is very noisy in low light. Too much detail is lost. Just OK in the good light 8 +1 I'd add, it's not fair to use a zoom against primes. In comparison, XF 16-55/ with a total of 17 elements in 12 groups, is very noisy in low light. Too much detail is lost. Just OK in the good light I totally agree with zoom is no match against prime And without your comment, I would not have thought of taking the Fuji Kit 18-55 f/ $600 when buy separate vs Sony 16-50 Kit lens $150 f/ May be just a tat unfair, but hey they're both "Kit" lens Since the model was only 6" tall, I would need to use max zoom for each lens And Sony can't go any bigger than I had to shoot Fuji at the same aperture All handheld, just to be sure I nailed the focus, I took 5 shots each cam and chose the sharpest Again in extreme low light 1/20s, f/ ISO 6400, SOOC 9 What annoys me the most is how the Fuji pictures are always darker at the same iso because apparently Fuji uses a different scale. Last edited Jun 15, 2019 10 Huge diff in sharpness 11 I totally agree with zoom is no match against prime And without your comment, I would not have thought of taking the Fuji Kit 18-55 f/ $600 when buy separate vs Sony 16-50 Kit lens $150 f/ May be just a tat unfair, but hey they're both "Kit" lens Since the model was only 6" tall, I would need to use max zoom for each lens And Sony can't go any bigger than I had to shoot Fuji at the same aperture All handheld, just to be sure I nailed the focus, I took 5 shots each cam and chose the sharpest Again in extreme low light 1/20s, f/ ISO 6400, SOOC Because, ppl call them kit lens, does not mean, they are equal. What you can get for $150? Waste of money. 12 The Sony lens looks pretty sharp to me. Both cameras performed really good here IMO. 13 Are you saying those last two doll shots were both hand held at 1/20th sec post 8? At that shutter speed I would expect the possibility of motion blur would be rather significant, with or without stabilization. How can any discussion of sharpness be valid if hand held at 1/20th sec? Your results may suggest that image stabilizaion of the a6500 is more effective than Fuji's OIS, but to compare sharpness you need a tripod. 14 Are you saying those last two doll shots were both hand held at 1/20th sec post 8? At that shutter speed I would expect the possibility of motion blur would be rather significant, with or without stabilization. How can any discussion of sharpness be valid if hand held at 1/20th sec? Your results may suggest that image stabilizaion of the a6500 is more effective than Fuji's OIS, but to compare sharpness you need a tripod. Yes, all hand held 1/20 is plenty. I normally shoot at 1/8 with sharp sharp images. Any below than 1/8 might not be as sharp X-H1's IBIS isn't far from a6500's Fuji 18-55mm OIS is stops. With X-H1 IBIS, cooperative control total of stops So shooting 1/8 is sort of normal for me 15 Just for curious, I went and take a shot at 1/6s yes still hand held Still holding its sharpness, crazy little camera Last edited Jun 16, 2019 16 That's really impressive for hand held but I do see some softness in that image of I pixel peep. 17 Yes, all hand held 1/20 is plenty. I normally shoot at 1/8 with sharp sharp images. Any below than 1/8 might not be as sharp X-H1's IBIS isn't far from a6500's Fuji 18-55mm OIS is stops. With X-H1 IBIS, cooperative control total of stops So shooting 1/8 is sort of normal for me Amazing! Hoping Fuji will eventually figure out a way to offer IBIS in some of their smaller, more affordable bodies. 18 Aww, man, Alisa? Pfft. You gotta get some Julia or Zafina in there, stat. Good on you for doing a second test without the Sony multi-frame NR. It does go to show how much work the software is doing. But hey, you're getting the results you want and that's what matters. Still, now use that feature on a tripod and you'll really blow peoples' minds. What annoys me the most is how the Fuji pictures are always darker at the same iso because apparently Fuji uses a different scale. It's not so much a different "scale" as it is that camera ISOs are poorly-defined in the first place and to account for manufacturing tolerances any manufacturer is allowed to label pretty much any ISO whatever they like, which they all abuse; Fuji just abuse that chance even more than the others. Except the Canon 80D, which is an almost exact copy, ISO-wise, of Fuji. Of course in this example the lens is different, too, and there could be different transmission even at the same aperture, further exaggerating the difference in exposure. But all that only matters when you are comparing two different cameras directly head-to-head like this and you're trying to match your results by copying the numbers. For 'real' shooting you can just use your eyes, forget the numbers even exist at all, and just shift stuff up or down until it looks right. 'S what I do most of the time, to be honest. Sticking the camera on auto ISO and then just using exposure compensation to get the brightness looking right on the screen, ignoring what ISO number the camera claims to be using, is a big headache-saver. I never mix systems in a shoot so Fuji's massive over-valuing of their ISO ratings doesn't actually cause a problem.

fuji xh1 vs sony a6500